Connect with us

Fintech

Lawsuit Alleges Apple Pay a Trillion-Dollar ‘Fence’ for Stolen Wallet IP | PYMNTS.com

Published

on

Digital payments solution provider Fintiv is accusing Apple of racketeering and trade-secret theft in a new federal suit over the technology that powers Apple Pay.

Fintiv’s complaint, lodged Wednesday (Aug. 6) in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, alleges that Apple posed as a prospective partner a decade ago to gain inside access to CorFire’s (now Fintiv’s) mobile-wallet platform.

Between 2011 and 2012, Apple engineers allegedly sat through multiple NDA-protected technical sessions, only to hire key CorFire personnel and roll the stolen know-how into the 2014 launch of Apple Pay.

The filing claims Apple’s secure-element design, NFC implementation and trusted-service-management layer are “carbon copies” of Fintiv’s proprietary architecture, helping Apple Pay become a multibillion-dollar revenue engine.

Read more: Fintiv’s court filing

The suit invoked both federal and Georgia Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) statutes.

Fintiv said Apple erected a “fence” by forming an “association-in-fact enterprise” with issuing banks and card networks; the enterprise purportedly processes trillions of dollars in Apple Pay transactions each year, monetizing Fintiv’s trade secrets at a massive scale.

The complaint portrayed the dispute as part of a broader Apple playbook, citing similar trade-secret rows with HealthTech firms Masimo and Valencell to suggest a pattern of “partner, poach and profit.”

“Apple’s theft of Fintiv’s technology is part of a pattern and practice … falsely pretending to partner with companies in order to steal confidential and proprietary information … all in order to steal the company’s valuable intellectual property and use it to commercialize the business on its own,” the complaint stated.

As examples, the complaint cited “a similar pernicious scheme” to steal trade secrets from Masimo Corp. “which had developed non-invasive technology related to blood oxygen monitoring which Apple believed was key to overcoming performance issues with its Apple watch.”

Apple, it is alleged, perpetrated a similar scheme against a biotech company named Valencell Inc., where it entered into discussions and negotiations under the guise of seeking to license Valencell’s active heart-monitoring technology. Apple’s alleged scheme was — as with Fintiv and Masimo — not to partner or license with Valencell, “but to steal Valencell’s technology and incorporate it into Apple’s products, which Apple then marketed and sold on its own without paying a nickel to Valencell,” according to the complaint.

Apple has not yet issued a public response; the company typically declines comment on pending litigation, but is expected to move for dismissal. Investors shrugged — Apple shares closed up 0.4% Thursday (Aug. 7) — yet payments insiders say the suit could rekindle scrutiny of Apple Pay’s alleged “tax” on card issuers and networks.

This isn’t the first suit Fintiv has filed against Apple. A Texas court this week dismissed a related patent infringement suit, according to Reuters.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Fintech

Chinese Money Laundering Networks Flagged as ‘Severe Threat’ by FinCEN | PYMNTS.com

Published

on

The Treasury Department’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) has issued a warning that Chinese money laundering networks are now among the most significant threats to the U.S. financial system, fueling operations of Mexico’s most powerful drug cartels.

In a new advisory released Thursday (August 28), FinCEN said groups including the Sinaloa Cartel and the Jalisco New Generation Cartel are increasingly using Chinese money laundering networks to clean billions in drug proceeds. The networks have become effective partners because they can move cash quickly, absorb losses and leverage demand from Chinese nationals seeking to bypass Beijing’s strict currency controls. By pairing cartel dollars with Chinese demand for U.S. currency, these networks have created what FinCEN called a “mutualistic relationship” that strengthens both sides.

The 15-page report outlines how these networks operate. They rely on informal value transfer systems, “mirror” transactions and trade-based money laundering schemes to shift funds across borders without physically moving cash. Some recruit Chinese students in the U.S. to act as money mules, depositing cartel cash into U.S. bank accounts and disguising the flows as tuition or living expenses. Others purchase electronics, luxury goods, and real estate with illicit funds, later reselling or exporting those assets to create the appearance of legitimate commerce.

“Chinese money laundering networks are professional money launderers that play a vital role in laundering the cartels’ drug proceeds in the United States,” the advisory said. “This is due to the speed and effectiveness of their operations, as well as their willingness to absorb financial losses and assume risks for the cartels and other clients.”

The advisory also lists “red flag” indicators for financial institutions, ranging from students depositing unusually large sums of cash to small businesses with outsized luxury goods transactions. FinCEN urged banks to reference the identifier “CMLN-2025-A003” when filing suspicious activity reports, and to pay special attention to transactions tied to unlicensed money service businesses, informal transfer systems and trade-based schemes.

FinCEN’s move follows a January executive order that designated several cartels as foreign terrorist organizations, underscoring the administration’s concern that cartel financing now poses not only a criminal but also a national security threat. The advisory ends with a reminder that financial institutions are on the front line of detecting suspicious flows and that voluntary information sharing under existing safe harbors can help expose networks that otherwise thrive in the shadows.

Continue Reading

Fintech

Revolut Considers Hiring Advisers on US Banking Acquisition | PYMNTS.com

Published

on

U.K. FinTech Revolut is reportedly getting closer to entering the U.S. banking space.

The company is mulling hiring investment bankers to advise it on a possible acquisition of an American lender to bolster its growth in the U.S., Bloomberg News reported Thursday (Aug. 28), citing sources familiar with the matter.

One source told the news outlet that Revolut is still deciding between an acquisition or applying for its own banking license, and that these deliberations are happening as the company readies the launch of savings products for U.S. consumers in the weeks ahead.

The report follows a similar story from the Financial Times late last month, which said Revolut was considering the acquisition of a U.S.-chartered bank. A spokesperson for Revolut declined to comment when reached by PYMNTS.

As the Bloomberg report notes, Revolut has operated for years in the U.S. by collaborating with other banks. But now, the company and its competitors are seeking a greater share of the banking space amid a more relaxed attitude toward financial regulation in Washington.

Revolut is still in the process of establishing its banking presence in its home country. It took the FinTech more than three years to land a U.K. banking license, and while it eventually secured that permission, it must operate under certain restrictions. Per Bloomberg, Revolut has said it’s in the closing stages of this process.

“Given Revolut’s global scale, this is the largest and most complex mobilization ever undertaken in the UK,” the firm said in a statement last month. “A thorough review is an expected part of the process and getting this right is more important than rushing to meet a specific date.”

Revolut CEO Nik Storonsky has said that the company’s “grow fast” ethos had been ill-advised because a smaller firm would have been able to obtain licenses more easily than one the size of Revolut.

Meanwhile, last month saw a report that the British government and the U.K. central bank had suffered a “falling out” due to delays in allowing a full banking license for Revolut.

Bank of England Gov. Andrew Bailey denied that report, saying the central bank and British treasury have a good relationship.

Continue Reading

Fintech

Ant and Standard Chartered Test Bank-to-Wallet Payments Offering | PYMNTS.com

Published

on

Live productions of this solution using the ISO 20022 financial messaging standards are underway, Standard Chartered announced Wednesday (Aug. 27).

Using Ant’s Alipay+ global wallet gateway services, the first transactions were completed between a Standard Chartered Bank customer account and a partner e-wallet. The solution employs Swift’s network of more than 11,500 financial institutions in 200-plus countries and territories to connect to 1.7 billion user accounts on the 36 global digital wallets in the Alipay+ ecosystem, particularly across fast-growing Asian markets.

“In a world of fast-moving innovation with a growing number of ways to move value, consumers and businesses expect more choice and optionality in their international payments experience,” said Kevin Wong, chief executive for Swift’s Asia Pacific operations.

“Swift is at the forefront of providing a best-in class experience with greater flexibility and choice. This collaboration with Ant International and Standard Chartered reflects that strategic commitment to faster, frictionless payments across multiple networks.”

The partnership comes in the midst of a shift in digital wallet usage among consumers and small businesses, as research by PYMNTS Intelligence has found.

The research found a growing preference for digital wallets when sending and receiving money across borders, particularly among consumers. The study found that 42% of consumers pointed to digital wallets as their top choice, outpacing traditional methods like bank account transfers and money transfer services. The figure was slightly higher among Americans, at 44%.

In addition, close to half of the consumers who don’t use digital wallets for international payments anticipate adopting them for peer-to-peer (P2P) transactions in the near future, “pointing toward further expansion of digital wallet usage in this domain,” PYMNTS wrote.

The chief drivers of this adoption included the perceived speed and growing trust associated with digital wallets.

“However, the burgeoning popularity of digital wallets in cross-border payments presents opportunities and challenges for banks,” PYMNTS wrote in April. “While consumers and businesses embrace the convenience offered by digital wallets, the report found interoperability issues that hinder seamless transactions across different platforms and countries.”

According to the study, 62% of banks in the U.S. and U.K. that are innovating or looking to innovate in cross-border payments plan to do so by teaming up with FinTech companies. The key factor behind these partnerships is the need for faster payment processing.

Continue Reading

Trending